6 June 2014
The mid-term evaluation covers the Ghana CP 200247 operation (2012-2016). It was intended for both accountability and learning and focuses on assessing: i) the appropriateness and coherence of the operation; ii) its results; and iii) the factors explaining the results.
The evaluation assessed the following activities: school meals; purchase for progress; treatment for moderate acute malnutrition for young children, pregnant and lactating women; prevention of stunting and micronutrient deficiencies; the creation or restoration of risk reduction and disaster mitigation community assets and skills training for income generating activities.
The evaluation, which makes a number of recommendations for the future, was managed and conducted by a consultancy firm, with fieldwork taking place in February-March 2015.
20 May 2011
The Annual Evaluation Report for 2010 focuses on operational issues arising from evaluations of country portfolios and operations, and impact evaluations of selected school feeding programmes.
The findings reaffirm WFP’s corporate areas of strength in responding to emergencies under the most difficult circumstances and in providing school feeding, as one of the Programme’s flagship programmes. However, impact evaluations of these programmes also showed the importance of implementing school feeding in cooperation with partners who invest in education sector improvements. Areas where largest improvements can be made relate to food-for-work, where funding often is curtailed and thus strategic objectives moved beyond reach, and nutrition where the ambiguous objectives and small size of programmes make it difficult to demonstrate results.
26 May 2010
In a changing environment, WFP’s support to basic education is well in line with government policies and has helped increase the number of children going through school. The Take-Home Rations for girls offer a model of best practice. Supplementary feeding and health and nutrition education has also shown some positive results but needs re-aligning with new government thinking. Overall, sharper focus is needed and learning from the mixed experience on strategies for hand-over to government.